Switzerland: Building a mosque harder than other religious buildings
See also: Pictures from the "Dome, temple, minaret" exhibition
Experts have been studying why it is easier for some non-native religions to build a temple or church in Switzerland, whereas others, such as Muslims, face resistance.
Lucerne University researchers have been examining the complex issue of new religious buildings and their symbols in the public domain, and the possible tensions that can arise from this. Their results form the basis for a special exhibition.
"Dome, temple, minaret: the new face of Switzerland", documenting the emergence of 18 new religious buildings in Switzerland since 1945, is currently being held in the town of Biel, before moving on to Bern, Basel, Zug and Nyon.
"We see that in the same city, two religions do not receive the same treatment," said Andreas Tunger-Zanetti, from the Religion Research Centre at Lucerne University and the exhibition's coordinator.
According to the researcher, the public is not that familiar with the small Swiss Sikh community, but the media is full of stories of Islamic terror, making Muslims an easy target for politicians.
The case of Langenthal underlines the deep transformations that are taking place in the Swiss religious landscape. Church attendance among the main traditional organised religions in Switzerland is very low, but migration has brought an increase in non-native, lesser-known religions.
While the majority of the population (75 per cent) are of either Catholic or Protestant faith, at the last census in 2000 there were more than 311,000 Muslims, 132,000 members of Orthodox churches, 18,000 Jews, 21,000 Buddhists and 28,000 Hindus. It is estimated the number of Muslims and Hindus now stand at around 400,000 and 50,000, respectively.
Public acceptance of a new religious building depends on a range of factors, like the political context, media climate and whether the religion is new or established, say researchers.
(..)
General public perception is also important, said Tunger-Zanetti: "Buddhism encounters less prejudice than Islamic communities, especially since September 11, but you can't say that Buddhists per se are much more peaceful than Muslims."
He added that it was easier to build a mosque in a big city, like Geneva or Zurich, than in a small location, and it helps if you carry out a proper communication campaign early on, have sufficient funds or a local backer.
(..)
Tunger-Zanetti is convinced that current frictions over minarets or other religious symbols are part of a "natural necessary process" that occurs in every society when foreigners are being integrated.
The difference in Switzerland is that direct democracy means people get to vote on proposals like the anti-minaret initiative.
"But the advantage is that Swiss society leads the discussion," said the researcher. "It will most probably conclude that it can cope with this emerging diversity and plurality in the same way that society coped with similar problems in the past, like between Catholics and Protestants."
"People tend to forget history," he said, pointing to the fact that the huge Catholic Valentin Church in predominantly Protestant Lausanne, built in 1832, was only allowed to have a bell tower in the 1930s.
"In the end it was built and Lausanne society didn't collapse," he said "Catholics and Protestants now live side by side and the same can be expected of us living next to Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims in 20 years time."
(more)
Source: SwissInfo (English)
See also: Pictures from the "Dome, temple, minaret" exhibition
Experts have been studying why it is easier for some non-native religions to build a temple or church in Switzerland, whereas others, such as Muslims, face resistance.
Lucerne University researchers have been examining the complex issue of new religious buildings and their symbols in the public domain, and the possible tensions that can arise from this. Their results form the basis for a special exhibition.
"Dome, temple, minaret: the new face of Switzerland", documenting the emergence of 18 new religious buildings in Switzerland since 1945, is currently being held in the town of Biel, before moving on to Bern, Basel, Zug and Nyon.
"We see that in the same city, two religions do not receive the same treatment," said Andreas Tunger-Zanetti, from the Religion Research Centre at Lucerne University and the exhibition's coordinator.
According to the researcher, the public is not that familiar with the small Swiss Sikh community, but the media is full of stories of Islamic terror, making Muslims an easy target for politicians.
The case of Langenthal underlines the deep transformations that are taking place in the Swiss religious landscape. Church attendance among the main traditional organised religions in Switzerland is very low, but migration has brought an increase in non-native, lesser-known religions.
While the majority of the population (75 per cent) are of either Catholic or Protestant faith, at the last census in 2000 there were more than 311,000 Muslims, 132,000 members of Orthodox churches, 18,000 Jews, 21,000 Buddhists and 28,000 Hindus. It is estimated the number of Muslims and Hindus now stand at around 400,000 and 50,000, respectively.
Public acceptance of a new religious building depends on a range of factors, like the political context, media climate and whether the religion is new or established, say researchers.
(..)
General public perception is also important, said Tunger-Zanetti: "Buddhism encounters less prejudice than Islamic communities, especially since September 11, but you can't say that Buddhists per se are much more peaceful than Muslims."
He added that it was easier to build a mosque in a big city, like Geneva or Zurich, than in a small location, and it helps if you carry out a proper communication campaign early on, have sufficient funds or a local backer.
(..)
Tunger-Zanetti is convinced that current frictions over minarets or other religious symbols are part of a "natural necessary process" that occurs in every society when foreigners are being integrated.
The difference in Switzerland is that direct democracy means people get to vote on proposals like the anti-minaret initiative.
"But the advantage is that Swiss society leads the discussion," said the researcher. "It will most probably conclude that it can cope with this emerging diversity and plurality in the same way that society coped with similar problems in the past, like between Catholics and Protestants."
"People tend to forget history," he said, pointing to the fact that the huge Catholic Valentin Church in predominantly Protestant Lausanne, built in 1832, was only allowed to have a bell tower in the 1930s.
"In the end it was built and Lausanne society didn't collapse," he said "Catholics and Protestants now live side by side and the same can be expected of us living next to Hindus, Sikhs and Muslims in 20 years time."
(more)
Source: SwissInfo (English)
No comments:
Post a Comment