Netherlands: 30% immigrants in 2050

According to the Dutch Statistics Bureau by 2050 there will be 16.8 million people in the Netherlands, which is 400,000 more than today. 1.6 million will be immigrants. The growth will be mainly due to immigrants and their part in the population will grow to about a third.

The decline in the ethnic population as well as their part in the population will continue unabated. In 2050 there are expected to be 12 million, which is 1.2 million less than today.

The sharpest growth is by the non-Western immigrants. Those are defined as people who have at least one parent from a non-Western country (not including Indonesia and Japan). Their numbers will grow from 1.7 million to 2.7 million. Together with the Western immigrants the total immigrant population will grow from 1.4 million today to 2.1 million - about 29% of the population.

The growth in the non-Western immigrant group is accounted almost wholly by the 2nd generation, which are born in the Netherlands. This includes not only Turks and Moroccans but also the more recent and mostly young asylum seekers from especially Iran, Iraq and Afghanistan.

Source: Elservier (Dutch)

See also: Netherlands: 50% immigrants among youth in cities (saying that by 2030 the non-Western immigrant population in the medium and bigger cities will be 30%).


Anonymous said...


1 – In 2001, he didn’t attack Islamism as the real enemy in 11 of September. Nothing did for stop the islamfascists of ACLU and CAIR destroy christianism and force the students to swallow the Islamic shit in the classrooms. And still permits islamonazists publications which prepare the war against the population disseminated by the Saudi Arabia in libraries of mosques, streets and bookstores for American muslims, preaching the destruction of America with anti-American antichristian, anti-Jewish, misogynistic, jihadist and supremacist ideology. Obvious: Bush family has oil business with the Saudi real family. Can we trust in a leader sharing interests with the enemy?

2 – In 2002, he didn’t denounce the responsibility of the government Clinton for CIA errors that enabled the 11 of September. The investigator of the Department of Defense that was following a trail that would have avoided the attack, the lieutenant-colonel Tony Shaffer, simply was prevented from pass the information to the FBI, that like this could not dismantle the Al-Qaeda cell. It stopped why? Because former president Clinton centralized the straight control of all the organs of security and blocked deliberately the communications among them. CIA, FBI and other agencies then were driving parallel inquiries about the illegal funds of given campaign to the candidate Clinton by the Chinese army one and the subsequent favors that the very grateful president lent to the service of Chinese espionage. Without exchange of information, the investigators did not be able to join the threads of the story line.

3 – In 2003, he did not announce that the weapons of destruction in batter of Saddam Hussein were found. They are more of 500 – enough for kill for poisoning the inhabitants of some twenty American cities. Republican senator Rick Santorum, using of the privileges of the Freedom of Information Act, obtained from the military secret service the complete relation. Reporter Richard Miniter already to have revealed the existence of those weapons, in its book "Disinformation: 22 Average Myths that Undermine the War on Terror". The strange point in the episode is that senator Santorum has had of pull out by force an information that Bush government should be screaming in all the media.

4 – In 2004, he did not condemn UNO by the scandal of corruption in the Oil by Food Program, involving Saddam Hussein and Koffi Annan and his son Kojo, and the governments of countries as France, Russia, Germany, China... Beyond others crimes of the UNO, that became the worst enemy of the U.S.A. by the simple fact that it shelters or protects all the anti-American and terrorist dictatorships in her Commissions.

5 – In 2005, he did not defend himself neither attacked the Democrats responsible by the calamity of the hurricane Katrina: the governor of Louisiana, Kathleen Blanco, and the mayor of New Orleans, Ray Nagin.

6 – AND in 2006, was discovered that he, as a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) signed an agreement for dissolve the borders between the U.S.A., Canada and the Mexico, practically eliminating the American nation as an independent political unit. The idea already was old, but then a citizen appealed to the Freedom of Information Act, obliging the government it divulge the documents about the matter. Then already there was conservatives calling Bush openly of "treacherous". The report can be read in the site

Ferdy said...

One thing that also continues to be overlooked (BTW not by Mark Steyn his pessimistic book ‘America alone’), is the demographics.

The 70-30% is not only more problematic when one adds the geographical distribution. It’s a direct military threat when seen in terms of age distribution. The 30% Muslim, is very young, the 70% is relatively very old. When one compares the percentage of military capable young men, it’s probably 50-50% or worse. And then we are not even comparing the cultural assertiveness and willingness to fight of each group….